Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

±¸È£Èí ¾ç»óÀ» º¸ÀÌ´Â ¾Æµ¿ ¹× û¼Ò³âÀÇ Çϼø µÎ²² º¯È­¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

Thickness Changes of the Lower Lip in Mouth Breathing Children and Adolescent

±¸°­È¸º¹ÀÀ¿ë°úÇÐÁö 2012³â 28±Ç 1È£ p.47 ~ 56
Á¤¿µÈ£, ¹ÚÀοµ, ÀÌÀÏÈ«, ÀÌ»ó¹Î, ¾çº´È£,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¤¿µÈ£ ( Jeong Young-Ho ) - ÇѸ²´ëÇб³ ¼º½Éº´¿ø Ä¡°ú ±³Á¤°ú
¹ÚÀοµ ( Park In-Young ) - ÇѸ²´ëÇб³ ¼º½Éº´¿ø Ä¡°ú ±³Á¤°ú
ÀÌÀÏÈ« ( Lee Il-Hong ) - ÇѸ²´ëÇб³ ¼º½Éº´¿ø Ä¡°ú ±³Á¤°ú
ÀÌ»ó¹Î ( Lee Sang-min ) - ´Ü±¹´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇк´¿ø ±³Á¤°ú
¾çº´È£ ( Yang Byun-Ho ) - ¼­¿ï Y±³Á¤Ä¡°ú

Abstract

ÀÔ¼úÀº »ç¶÷ÀÇ ÀλóÀ» °áÁ¤ÇÏ´Â Áß¿äÇÑ ºÎºÐÁßÀÇ ÇϳªÀÌ´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸´Â µÎºÎ°èÃø¹æ»ç¼±»çÁøÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ±¸È£ÈíÀÚ¿Í ºñÈ£ÈíÀÚÀÇ ÀÔ¼úµÎ²²¸¦ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ±¸È£Èí°ú Çϼø µÎ²² º¯È­¿ÍÀÇ ¿¬°ü¼ºÀ» ¾Ë¾Æº¸¾Ò´Ù. 8¼¼~18¼¼ÀÎ ¾Æµ¿ ¹× û¼Ò³â 436¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î µÎºÎ¹æ»ç¼±°èÃø»çÁøÀ» Á¶»çÇÏ¿´´Ù. Àüü Á¶»ç´ë»óÀÚ¸¦ ±¸È£Èí ±×·ì°ú ºñÈ£Èí ±×·ìÀ¸·Î¸¸ ³ª´©¾î¼­ Æò±Õ°ú Ç¥ÁØÆíÂ÷¸¦ ±¸ÇÑ °á°ú ±¸È£Èí ±×·ìÀÇ Çϼø/»ó¼ø ºñÀ²Àº 1.13¡¾0.14, ºñÈ£Èí ±×·ìÀÇ Çϼø/»ó¼ø ºñÀ²Àº 1.02¡¾0.14·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. Skeletal class¿¡ µû¶ó ±¸ºÐÇÑ ±×·ìÀÇ °¢°¢ÀÇ Æò±Õ°ú Ç¥ÁØÆíÂ÷¸¦ »ìÆ캸¸é skeletal class IÀº 1.05¡¾0.09, skeletal class II´Â 1.20¡¾0.12, skeletal class III´Â 0.97¡¾0.11·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. È£Èí¾ç»ó¿¡ µû¶ó ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´À» ¶§ ºñÈ£ÈíÀ» ÇÏ´Â ±×·ìº¸´Ù ±¸È£ÈíÀ» ÇÏ´Â ±×·ì¿¡¼­ Çϼø/»ó¼ø ºñÀ²ÀÌ ´õ Å« °ªÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾î ÇϼøÀÇ µÎ²²°¡ ´õ µÎ²¨¿î ¾ç»óÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. Skeletal class¿¡ µû¶ó¼­ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´À» ¶§´Â skeletal class II ±×·ì¿¡¼­ Çϼø/»ó¼ø ºñÀ²ÀÌ °¡Àå Å« °ªÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾î ÇϼøÀÇ µÎ²²°¡ °¡Àå µÎ²¨¿î ¾ç»óÀ» º¸¿´´Ù

As attractive lips are important component of appealing faces, the study was conducted to investigate the association
of mouth-breathing and thickness of lower lips in mouth-breathers and nasal-breathers. The subjects were 436 adolescent
patients aged 8 ~ 18 years who took cephalometrics. The results were as follows. The ratio of lower lip thickness to that
of upper lip thickness in mouth breathing and nasal breathing groups were 1.13¡¾0.14, 1.02¡¾0.14,respectively. According
to subjects? skeletal pattern, the ratio in Class I sample was 1.05¡¾0.09. Class II subjects showed 1.20¡¾0.12, and Class
III showed 0.97¡¾0.11. Mouth - breathers had higher lower / upper lip ratio than nasal breathers meaning their lower lips
were thicker. Skeletal Class II patients group showed the most thickest lower lips among Class I, II, III subgroups.

Å°¿öµå

±¸È£Èí;ÀÔ¼úµÎ²²
mouth- breathing;thickness of lips

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI